you probably need an older driver, some version from the 15.xx line
seems like AMDGPU-PRO doesn't support CGN 1 chips
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by Chainik
you probably need an older driver, some version from the 15.xx line
seems like AMDGPU-PRO doesn't support CGN 1 chips
I mean run SVPManager via gdb to the point where it crashes "when it tries to assess GPU based frame rendering"
run it via gdb one more time
that was about Windows drivers...
does utils/clinfo works?
echo "1" > ui-scale.txt
> doesn't exist in my SVP installation directory
ah, ok
> Floating point exception (core dumped)
gdb ./SVPManager
run
?
mpv.conf syntax is the same on all supported platforms
if we're talking about 32-bit version - try to revert to Avisynth 2.6 (extract that one - https://www.dropbox.com/s/dckxoowjlzwku … 0150220.7z - into PotPlayer's folder)
try to remove/rename "ui-scale.txt" file
I did, but I can't use the SVPManager then...
what do you mean by "can't use"?
can you run SVPManager? what do you see in console?
which Avisynth version is in use in the PotPlayer?
probably because ffdshow uninstall doesn't remove all the registry entries and SVP install still thinks that ffdshow32 is installed
> there seems to be no way to have SVP running without the SVP
run it with "-tray" arg
You probably do something wrong.
SVP's log should show some error message...
I think you can just press "ignore"
You need cookies file and UA string for the Crunchyroll to work. NOT the username/password pair!
> программа не запускается на процессорах AMD без SSE2.
в Windows 95 тоже не работает
it's only "required" if software decoding itself eats a lot of CPU power
e.g. for 4K h.265 it's "required"
btw you can try other options - QuickSync decoder via Intel's GPU core or NV CUVID decoder (but don't use it in 32-bit video players cause it'll hang!)
Alex
I could create an account on the wiki if you want
Да, потому что Python...
> А так задумка вообще хорошая получилась по удобству и юзабельности.
А SVPtube ДВА - еще лучше!
this's sad, I'd prefer to figure out what was wrong
Kind and number of artifacts are the same for both MVTools and SVPflow using comparable options, i.e. the same block sizes, search type and radius, with the only difference in shapes of those artifacts.
But I agree that in some cases (like in the example above) SVPflow produces more "blending", probably because of some nasty bug and there's definitely a room for improvements here.
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by Chainik
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.