26 Reply by narkohol

(26 replies, posted in Using SVP)

UHD wrote:

If you want to get a really good quality with the least amount of artifacts possible use this: https://www.svp-team.com/wiki/RIFE_AI_interpolation

I've been doing some comparision tests lately:

this is the original file, 23.976fps:
https://mega.nz/file/RNoFTRSI#ff2Ftwxg6 … 0ZDuFOQsrY

This is Flowframes RIFE 4 at 48fps:
https://mega.nz/file/cVpR3LaR#l7X_rKjy9 … nFHTLO8OG8
https://i.imgur.com/zKwl6dp.png

This is TVP at 48fps:
https://mega.nz/file/QBwSQQpY#0Rit0oLPh … hG9DUtWHHU
https://i.imgur.com/csyrQXL.png

and this is DmitriRender at 60fps:
https://mega.nz/file/lABzxQIT#eaMpUXa2K … plhWA1ldQc
https://i.imgur.com/6BsHfn0.png

to record the DmitriRender solution I used Nvidia's Shadowplay capturing the PotPlayer window at Fullscreen
as you can see, both RIFE and TVP have similar artifacts on the left wall with the lines

while DmitriRender has almost none in comparision, even when the x2 48fps plays in favor of both RIFE and TVP, vs the x2.5025 60fps in DmitriRender

Normal SVP (non RIFE) has similar artifacts to RIFE.

I tried using SVP settings suggested on this thread: https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=80895 and this other one: https://www.svp-team.com/forum/search.p … er_id=7145
but it still isn't as smooth or artifact free as DmitriRender in this scene example.

Is there any way to improve SVP to make it really as smooth as DmitriRender and reduce the artifacts in patterns?

Go to forum: Using SVP

27 Reply by narkohol

(24 replies, posted in Using SVP)

I tried these settings and they are good, but *not* as smooth as DmitriRender. And there are more artifacts in some places, like in this scene from Winter Soldier: https://mega.nz/file/RNoFTRSI#ff2Ftwxg6 … 0ZDuFOQsrY

https://i.imgur.com/zKwl6dp.png

Tried all settings variations suggested on this thread but I didn't see any improvement in the artifacts in this scene or smoothness compared to DmitriRender.

Is there any way to really make it smoother?

Go to forum: Using SVP

28 Topic by narkohol

(0 replies, posted in Флуд)

Reshade Community seems heating up with the Nvidia support and new devs.


Is there going to be any specific interest towards Gaming in the Future from the SmoothVideo Project Devs or new efforts are allways going to be focused to movies/tv/video?


I'm asking because it worked fantastic for me to Interpolate PS4Pro through an ElgatoPro60 a few months back .

Sorry if this is the wrong forum or section. Not trying to bother, just curious...

Go to forum: Флуд

29 Reply by narkohol

(2 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Chainik wrote:

All settings -> set "frc.threads" = 2

Tried that with exact same settings as SVP3, but for some reason it is still slower. I don't think this is placebo on my part.


Chainik wrote:

I'm more surprised with the fact 2 threads can handle 1080p...
Which CPU do you have? Kabylake @5GHz ?

Ryzen1700@3.9


Chainik wrote:

> how do you think this pipeline can be improved?

Probably by using mpv.

As long as I understand (not much smile) mpv is a command line multiplatform player that doesn't have a GUI right? Can you elaborate how and what could be better?



Chainik wrote:

Just a little technical comment: number of threads is NOT a problem. The real problem is in ffdshow buffers size (open ffdshow properties, Avisynth tab, see "buffer back/ahead" values). In general, more threads need larger buffers -> gives higher latency, BUT you can adjust buffers size with frc.prefetch.ff_mul and frc.prefetch.ff_add values - <buffer size> = ff_mul * <threads> + ff_add. When the buffer will be too small for the given number of threads you'll see it wink

Mmmm...   I see. Tried several values for ffadd and the "buffer back/ahead" values in the the Avisynth tab get set to 0 - 7 instead the default 0 - 5. So it's more buffers and more latency right?


Chainik wrote:

You can now set 2 threads in SVP 4 but you can't lower ffdshow buffer size below 7. Damn...

You mean this is some unsolvable problem with ffdshow?

Go to forum: Using SVP

30 Topic by narkohol

(2 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Somebody told me about using SVP for 1080p pseudo-60fps realtime console gaming. Found some threads with some info here, but nothing too detailed.

After many tries this is the best pipeline I came up with for best quality, smoothness and lowest input lag. I'm just a newbie in a trial/error quest so I guess this pipeline can be improved.

This method only works with SVP3, as setting Processing Threads to 2 is mandatory for minimum input lag. SVP4 doesn't have the same setting and doesn't work near as good.

Almost any capture card should work. I use an Elgato HD60 Pro PCIe capture card with Potplayer. Most people seem to use MPC but for me colors are not ok, it gives me problems in fullscreen and doesn't retain the capture card res and colorspace settings.

1. Set your capture card settings for 1080p30 capture at max quality.

2. Set Potplayer with the following settings.

https://s14.postimg.org/5ui3jxsld/image.png
https://s5.postimg.org/j18e7sjnb/image.png



The Built-in Direct3D 11 Video Renderer works well, but I think VMR 9 Windowed is faster, giving somehow lower input lag and a more responsive gameplay. Other video renderers either give me problems with colors, fullscreen, vsync, smoothness of SVP, or just felt slower.

https://s5.postimg.org/gjwn0k2br/image.png https://s5.postimg.org/3sigu0xon/image.png
https://s5.postimg.org/u0tljfs2v/image.png


    1. And this config in SVP:

https://s5.postimg.org/to27d9p8n/image.png


If you have audio synch issues, you can adjust Video delay:

https://s5.postimg.org/d0apas9wn/image.png

and the most important setting: right-click on the tray icon and set Processing Threads to 2. It's the only setting that gives a low enough lag to play in realtime.

https://s5.postimg.org/aiyy3i2uv/image.png

Somebody suggested disabling GPU-acceleration would improve lag too.

This is how the pipeline of Filters look in Potplayer:

https://s5.postimg.org/wlz66v9pz/image.png

https://s5.postimg.org/736ttuig7/image.png

I'm surprised that SVP4 can't show the same good results for this goal. And surprised the SVP-team haven't give this use more spotlight.

I'm currently pretty happy with the results using this method, but how do you think this pipeline can be improved?

Go to forum: Using SVP

31 Reply by narkohol

(3 replies, posted in Using SVP)

I tried POWERDVD 11 and TotalMedia Theatre 5. Don't know why, but none of them uses SVP.  sad

Go to forum: Using SVP

32 Topic by narkohol

(3 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Is there any way to use SVP with BluRay 3D Iso's?   I think I will wet my pants if I could see Avatar in my Acer H5360BD projector at 60 fps. :-)'''''''

Go to forum: Using SVP

33 Topic by narkohol

(1 replies, posted in Using SVP)

I get freezing & flashes when skipping or clicking in the timeline to go to a new point. The display flashes alternating the previous scene.

Is there any way to fix this?

My specs are i7 870 12Gb GTX480 (270.51) Win7 x64 and I am using Kmplayer with MadVr

Go to forum: Using SVP