Search options (Page 242 of 349)

Lelionmoddeur
Would be awesome if we could click somewhere to save the interpolated video

the only word coming to my head is "never"

anyway it's not practical at all.

and you were thinking making a good video rip is just a piece of cake?

James D
Не "пользуется чей-то", а "сейчас оно включилось".

1. YT has 2 types of videos now - 30 fps and 60 fps
2. SVPtube "renders" nothing, it just provides the URL that can be opened in any video player
3. SVP can interpolate whatever-you-want up to 120 Hz. It doesn't matter if the source is 10 fps or 60 fps. However 60 fps source will require MUCH more CPU power for interpolation.

In other words, if you have 120 Hz screen, SVP is running and set to "to screen refresh rate" and you'll open 60 fps YT stream via SVPtube - then it'll be interpolated to 120 fps

Ghostlamer
для старых форматов типа 4 к 3

для новых типа 21:9 ничем не хуже 

I have no idea then

SubJunk
I have this issue now

what was changed between "now" and "earlier"?

gkroller
$4000 samsung definitely should have FRC built-in

Гоняю младший MS Surface Pro 3, который на Core i3-4020Y (2-я Haswell на 1.5 ГГц, без турбо)

Результаты в базе, в реальной жизни 720p вроде бы как юзабелен (*), а вот с 1080p есть грабли. Т.е. SVP можно настроить так, что бы 1080p нормально работало при 80% загрузки CPU, но через пару минут включается вентилятор и оно начинает сбрасывать частоты. Тут то вся плавность и накрывается
Без SVP добиться включения вентилятора почти невозможно.

Кол-во попугаев очень похоже на "Athlon 5350 APU".

(*) надо попробовать хотя бы час 720p прогнать, может быть тоже не выдержит...

it was tested on version 2.1.4, may be something changed since then
and I've never tried BRs but only SBS and OU stereo pairs

1. SVP Core
2. MPC-HC 32-bit - see mpc-hc.org
3. http://www.svp-team.com/wiki/SVP:MPC-HC

and you're done

but you'd better ask some of your friends for help if you was able to "break youtube and other sites" with SVP installation 

Fanty1972
Its shader 23 that has a build in masking for ghosting artefacts (or to be exact: It has a bulild in masking for "Halo" (whats around objetcs that move in front of complicated stuff like trees) arftefacts). The masks use a complicated way of beeing calculated, so thats why it consumes considerable more hardware power.

The problem with 21th and 23th is the quality and precision of the "mask" and right now it's rather poor (but still much better than in MVTools).

21th is the most honest shader of all  
it shows "how it really works", BUT it also shows all flaws in motions vectors searching and in "cover-uncover" mask building

actually the mask is working but instead of halo you'll get less halo plus visible border in front of moving object

Можно посоветовать обратиться в поддержку AMD с вопросом, если вдруг что-то не устраивает в работе драйвера AMD