mashingan
How about HD5670?
i've got it and it sucks on hw decoding of 1920x1080 videos ![]()
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by Chainik
mashingan
How about HD5670?
i've got it and it sucks on hw decoding of 1920x1080 videos ![]()
If TS doesn't have $40 than may be you're right ![]()
but according to his question - he has ![]()
anyway gf210 can't even make 60 fps, according to SVPmark database
in fact it is slower than intel hd2500
Simple question - simple answer.
Why make it so complicated? ![]()
Nintendo Maniac 64
Rendering 144 fps on cpu is very heavy while rendering them on a low end gpu is pretty fast and gives higher quality. And offloads cpu for more useful tasks.
do you really think it's relevant to the topic?
can I use newer svpflow2.dll with older svpflow1.dll?
no
this one definitely should work
this time I tested it ![]()
something like gt630 i think
TCmullet
try this
[deleted]
James D
so context menu would be opened with right click button only, not both left and right
what
?
Mystery
Does it only affect areas that have artifacts
yep
in theory ![]()
mashingan
I think really interesing part is
after I overclocked from 4.2Ghz to 4.7Ghz, under the exact SAME SVP setting which worked fine with no delayed frames or dropped frames in MPC+Madvr, the amount of artifacts decreased.
this's why I was asking about 'placebo'
cause I'm sure, as a developer
, that SVP won't change anything in case of overclocking from 4.2 to 4.7 ![]()
and if he see something after overclocking - I can't even imagine what he possibly could find in a different video player ![]()
Blackfyre
after I overclocked from 4.2Ghz to 4.7Ghz, under the exact SAME SVP setting which worked fine with no delayed frames or dropped frames in MPC+Madvr, the amount of artifacts decreased.
are you familiar with the term "placebo"? ![]()
Blackfyre
it leaves SVP with a bigger head-room to use those resources (both the GPU for GPU-Acceleration & the CPU for making frames), thus resulting in less artifacts, because SVP has more resources to work with...
Good point but SVP is not smart enough to change settings according to available resources. ![]()
Blackfyre
This's very simple process - SVP is making frames and video player is renedering them.
There're no options for video player to reduce artifacts created by SVP other than
a) drop some (intermidiate) frames
b) blend frames
If you set 4x in SVP then MPDN probably blends each ~2 frames so it may (or may not) look like fewer artifacts.
=====
BTW I tried MPDN about 3 month ago and I wasn't impressed at all ![]()
Оно не может дать меньше артефактов, ибо артефакты рисует не плеер, дело плеера честно показать уже нарисованные артефакты.
Ну а сам плеер - скромненько, страшненько
это демонстрация технологии разработанного рендерера, а не плеер на каждый день.
ну нет - так нет
Nurk
Не, я в смысле что "это же сколько лишнего времени и сил у человека на такую ерунду"
Серьезно, бетатестерам давно пора обновить кровь. Может еще успеешь продвинуть что-то дефолтными параметрами в 3.1.7 ![]()
suserg2
Все вопросы на тему "почему не работает OpenCL" направляйте в техподдержку AMD.
Also, does madVR still use ffdshow or not?
look at the picture one more time:![]()
do you see that "ffdshow" square and "renderer" square are different ones? ![]()
How exactly does this work?
And what renderer was set before you changed it?
Cause it's supposed to be EVR-CP right after SVP installation.
1. Ensure that both video is rendered and SVP is working through NV card, not on i7's integrated one
2. Try to switch between plain EVR, EVR-CP and madVR video renderers
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by Chainik
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.