You are not logged in. Please login or register.
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by Chainik
FurMark loads only GPU
Prime95 loads only CPU
SVP loads both 
if it used to work for some time and suddenly begins to crash - it can be the PSU issue
TCmullet
I'm afraid I just don't have enough words to explain.
Any explanation here needs at least a whiteboard to draw on, unless you'll natively speak Russian 
In fact I can't tell I fully understand how it really works...
You can start from there
James D
Процессоры слишком умные стали, вручную не всегда рулятся...
А у всяких ультрабуков еще и производители самодеятельность блокируют.
TCmullet
this's a very small ball
while "promo graphic" demonstrates a car about 1/4 of a video frame
... or see this - http://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic … 233#p44233
дык, один не правильно сказал, остальные не правильно поняли...
dlr5668
Автор утверждает
Какой еще автор? Там автора нет. Фамилия автора Zachs.
I just was answering to mashingan about hd5670
cause i've got hd5670 and i don't like it
Nintendo Maniac 64
"hw decoder" means "hardware video decoder used for decoding video stream"
Nintendo Maniac 64
I know that in my system it works like this:
- 800p + hw decoder = working
- 1080p + hw decoder = stuttering
- 1080p + sw decoder = working
And itsn't about CGN but about UVD...
mashingan
there's very simple solution - turn off hw decoding for 1080p
full 1920*1080 + SVP isn't working on 56xx cards
and 1920*800 works well
mashingan
How about HD5670?
From GPU Compability, it has quite high rating
"that rating"'s "100%" is exactly at 60 fps * 100%
so for 144 fps it should have "rating" >= 240%
mashingan
How about HD5670?
i've got it and it sucks on hw decoding of 1920x1080 videos 
If TS doesn't have $40 than may be you're right
but according to his question - he has
anyway gf210 can't even make 60 fps, according to SVPmark database
in fact it is slower than intel hd2500
Simple question - simple answer.
Why make it so complicated?
Nintendo Maniac 64
Rendering 144 fps on cpu is very heavy while rendering them on a low end gpu is pretty fast and gives higher quality. And offloads cpu for more useful tasks.
do you really think it's relevant to the topic?
can I use newer svpflow2.dll with older svpflow1.dll?
no
this one definitely should work
this time I tested it
something like gt630 i think
TCmullet
try this
[deleted]
James D
so context menu would be opened with right click button only, not both left and right
what 
?
Mystery
Does it only affect areas that have artifacts
yep
in theory
mashingan
I think really interesing part is
after I overclocked from 4.2Ghz to 4.7Ghz, under the exact SAME SVP setting which worked fine with no delayed frames or dropped frames in MPC+Madvr, the amount of artifacts decreased.
this's why I was asking about 'placebo'
cause I'm sure, as a developer , that SVP won't change anything in case of overclocking from 4.2 to 4.7 
and if he see something after overclocking - I can't even imagine what he possibly could find in a different video player
Blackfyre
after I overclocked from 4.2Ghz to 4.7Ghz, under the exact SAME SVP setting which worked fine with no delayed frames or dropped frames in MPC+Madvr, the amount of artifacts decreased.
are you familiar with the term "placebo"?
SmoothVideo Project → Posts by Chainik
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.