Search options (Page 34 of 55)

I'm going to have to disagree with that for the following reason...

852x480 * 3 = 2556x1440
856x480 * 3 = 2568x1440

The latter would have to be instead scaled by 299% rather than an exact 300% on a 1440p monitor, thereby resulting in a resolution of 2560x1436

Also, consider that overscan is unfortunately still a thing in TVs, so it's very rare for even video game content to have critically-important information so close to the edge of the screen.  But even then, we only talking about 2 pixels here, which in reality is actually 1 pixel on the left and 1 pixel on the right.

That's not surprising since 32bit floating point is typically considered higher quality than 32bit integer even though the former "only" has 24bits of precision.

You could at the very least take screenshots of SVP4 vs SVP3 in the exact same interpolated frame...

(In MPC-HC, use Ctrl+right arrow to step to the next frame; this can be done while paused)

Did you un-register the previous registration from the following URL?
https://www.svp-team.com/secure/license_manager.php

This thread is relevant:
http://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=2965

Since it actually describes the very same issue.

Though it must be noted that most (if not all) of those displays accept an input video signal at 1360x768.

The trick is to make a custom resolution.  AMD users can use CRU while Nvidia and Intel users can use their respective graphics control panels.
(Nvidia users can also use CRU if they'd like)

Well, Nvidia isn't the only game in town...

I had an issue just like this months ago, but the version of avisynth that comes with current versions of SVP4 no longer gives me this issue.  Maybe your avisynth is outdated or something?  Alternatively, maybe you have an old version of avisynth.dll in the same folder as mpc-hc.exe and you never deleted it?

In the past, back when SVP used an older version of avisynth, I had to use the avisynth MT DLL from the following post and put it in the same folder as mpc-hc.exe:
http://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic … 963#p50963

A good amount of recordings of already digital content are in flat 30fps (screen recordings and videos games come to mind).

Regardless, my whole point was that it made it sound like you needed a 29.97fps video or that all 30fps videos were actually 29.97fps.

Surely you can just have your screen not change to 24Hz, right?

Also, it would be most optimal to use a screen refresh that is an exact multiple of the source video rather than just a flat 60Hz, such as using 48Hz for 24fps, 50Hz for 25fps, and 60Hz for 30fps; using an exact multiple gives a smoother result.

(example: with black-frame insertion, 60fps @ 60Hz is smoother than 60--to->90fps @ 90Hz, but 60--to->120fps @ 120Hz is smoothest of all)

Maybe in LAVfilters, try to disable all the output formats except YV12?