Search options (Page 38 of 55)

Just have the drivers for both installed - assuming that you're not using Vista, the OS should handle this fine (no guarantees though).  If you're using an AMD APU + AMD GPU, then the Catalyst drivers should be able to detect both.

If you have both integrated and discrete graphics, it would be wise to try having SVP on the integrated and MadVR on the discrete.

Well that depends on your display.  If you're connecting to a TV that has a quality upscaler (which should be most TVs), then I don't see much point in doing the upscaling on your PC.

The only exception would be if you watch a lot of standard definition content, because TVs typically only accept 640x480, 720x480, and 800x600 for SD input resolutions.

...then explain this:

18:25:49.020 [i]: Playback [90208]: Avisynth (32-bit) version 2.6.0.5, Avisynth 2.6, D:\__Programs__\Non-unicode Programs\Portable - settings at 'userprofile'\SVP Dev\avisynth.dll

Screenshot not possible because the entire text can't fit in the window.

Would it be blasphemous to suggest having more than a 30% +/- range available?

But my point is that the feature that I am looking for does not even seem to be available in the beta versions of SVP 4 FULL.

Therefore, much like the ability to customize the downsizing on a per-profile basis and the ability to interpolate to your current refresh rate while using D3D fullscreen, I fear that this function will also not make the transition from SVP3 to SVP4.

On a related note, I manually moved both of the avisynth DLLs into the SVP program directory and it worked fine... is there any reason they aren't put there instead?

It really just depends on the content. Why not try the video with SVP in real-time and see if there's any noticeable artifacts?  If CPU utilization is the issue then just run SVP with lower settings, like 1m + complicated + 16px + two pixel + downscale to 720p.

Kind of difficult when the likes of SVP4 treats 1080p VP9 @ 1280x720 and 1440p VP9 @ 1280x720 exactly the same even though the latter requires considerably more CPU utilization.

Since this thread got bumped, I might as well respond to this post...

I wasn't saying I was having an issue, I was just mentioning that, whenever MPC-HC cannot render a video in real-time for whatever reason, the video will start to fall behind the audio.  This most commonly occurs when rendering the video in question maxes out your CPU.

It's not my video, so no.  Heck I don't even own the game (I'm not sure my Pentium G3258's integrated GPU would hold up!).  Also I know that the uploader of that video uses a 1920x1200 monitor, so even he wouldn't have such a thing.

However, you might be able to cheat and just upscale and then re-render the video in question.

Secondly, it is a game that is available for purchase though several digital stores, so technically you could even manually replicate the visual situation shown in the video and make your own recording at whatever resolution you wish to run the game at.

If your monitor is only 1080p or similar, you could possibly use "downsampling" which allows you to output and render at a higher resolution than your monitor supports, and then record that via your on-screen recorder of choice.

EDIT: Here's a link to purchase "game" (or 'toy' as mentioned in the video):
http://panoramic.al/#buy

EDIT 2: To clarify what I meant by replicating the visual situation shown in the video, if you listen to what the commentator says in the surrounding minutes of that video, he alludes that you can see the "settings" used for the visual situation in the bottom-left of the screen, thereby allowing anyone to re-create the situation.