An buyed dvd can have an lifetime of 25 years+ ..
A burned dvd only 5-10 years you say !???
With cheap brands i agree 100%.. Have learned that the hard way myself !!!
But i recently have watched an burn of proximately 13 years old by now .. Not 1 hickup during playback
Furthermore, TRT scans showed 1 nice long CURVE upwards reaching READ speeds of 18x near the end.. Yeah , 1 of my dvd+rw drives is hacked to exceed read speeds
Ofcourse , and i have mentioned that on numerous occasions..
THAT IS if you USE and burn on QUALITY media ...
Add to that , that i have used Specialy DVD+R (HARD COATED) for my movies for LONG TIME STORAGE ...
Also, having 2000+ disc doesnt mean they all will FaiL to read at once you know .. meaning you wont have to replace them all at once, provided that you watch those movies again from time to time..
If not for the movie for testing purpose then ..
That said, the chances that all of my movies at the same time will fail to read is far less then 1 hdd failure in the same amount of time .. lets say 5-10 years... mkay .. u follow me..
For example i have my collection for like almost 15 years by now...
During that time i maybe had to rewrite 5 dvd TOPS that couldnt be read.. or started to wear off !!!
i know what u probebly thinking... how many dvd's do u have reviewed during that time..
Well, i watch atleast 3 movies a week from my collection... so lets do the math 3x1x52x15= drum beat... thats like over 2000+... Lo and behold ... that happends to be my collection lol
Iam just sayiing here... if the failure rate of plastic woud be like u say... between 5 - 10 years.. i woud be whitiout movies by now lol !!!
And the few i had to redo , i STILL COULD COPY / PAST lol and REBURN .. and on top of that iam talking about a few bad cheap brand & burns i have burned TOO fast (16x dvd) too i might add!!
hence, use only quality brands... never had to replace an good reputated brand that i have used for an → quality burn ← in the first place .
That said, quality burn is JUST AS IMPORTANT AS the brand of media if not more so important !!
During those 15 years i have replaced more of hdd's in laptops / computers from others then plastic discs ...
Granted, i have had maybe 1 bad hdd that wos completely useless beyond repair.. during that time..
But i still own 2 hdd's that have showned signs of wear and tear according to the smart status and extended tests !!!
And those HDD's arent as near as BIG as 4TB lol... like more less then 1/10 of that size !!!
That toO is an risk to think about, → the bigger the size the more sectors/clusters that can fail over time !!!!
Not to mention the amount of platterns a hdd can hold .... !!! like 2,3 platterns is not uncomon in BiG hdd's todays just and because of the capacity to hold so much data !!!
So you might want to re think the whole Durability VS price scenario if i were u ... Cuz .. if 1 hdd ... especialy 1 of 4TB will fail in the next 5 years ... it will sure cost u more then just 15Cents for an piece of plastic u know..
Iam not sure... like the cost of 1000 movies at once because of bad sectors or wurse...
That woud be the scenario if you woud use 1 big storage instead of several small ones ... dont u get it...
The risk of running 1 bigh huge hDD is much greater then having several smaller means of storage u know... maybe not cheaper 4xhdd vs 1HDD .. but its safer..
Also... another advantage of using several hdd's is that you can run them in raid too for faster speeds ..
4 tb hdd ... u must be either very BRAVE or the other one indeed.... lol...
Also, did u know that 4TB uses an GPT partition and because of that will likely causes backwards compatilibity issues in OS, applications.. and then theres the mobo (bios) that might not give the right estimate of the hdd its capacity etc etc...!!!
Realy.... i seriously would think twice+ before u bite the bullet on that one.. ...
cheers,