Search options (Page 52 of 55)

Actually you only need the bolded one as shown here:
http://www.svp-team.com/wiki/SVP:MPC-HC

OK, but the issue the topic creator is referring to is about SVP's GPU-acceleration rather than his GPU's DXVA decoder performance.

EDIT:

He clearly means content interpolated up to 144fps because, if he meant native 144fps content, then this wouldn't be an issue to ask on the SVP forum.  Not only that, but native 144fps videos have got to be incredibly rare (native 120fps videos are rare enough as it is)

EDIT 2 Besides, the r7 240 is faster and less expensive than the gt 630 you mentioned - the only downside is that it seems to require a PCIe 3.0 slot, which eixan may not have.

EDIT 3: ...and I just found out that there's actually two different revisions of the gt 630 - one that's Fermi and another that's Kepler.

Wait, DXVA2 hardware decoding or SVP GPU-acceleration?  Those are two very different things.

Just note that newer isn't always faster; in terms of performance you should almost always* ignore the first number of a CPU or GPU product since the first number is the equivalent of the year model on cars.

*I say almost because typically if all the other numbers are the same, like 6770 vs 7770, the one with the larger first number will be faster.  Also, the bigger the gap between the first number, the larger the difference - a HD7770 would be quite a bit faster than an HD4770 to the point that an HD7750 would probably be faster than said HD4770.

Anyway, back more to the issue at hand, has the topic creator tried running their monitor at 120hz instead?  Heck if you have the right model, you could even enable backlight strobing for reduced motion blur.

While it doesn't really solve the 144fps performance issue, it may very well actually look better in your eyes.

Info on backlight strobing:
http://www.blurbusters.com/zero-motion-blur/lightboost/

More info + larger compatiblity list:
http://www.monitortests.com/forum/Threa … and-NVIDIA

144hz and 144fps are not the same thing - your issue is that you're not getting 144fps.

Pretty much any video card can do 144hz; I ran 120hz back on an old Radeon 9600, could do 120hz on the Radeon 6310 integrated onto an AMD E-350 APU, and can do 125hz on the integrated Intel iGPU on my Pentium G3258.

Considering that you have a 6-thread CPU, it's very possible that could actually have better performance if you disabled GPU acceleration.

If you are insistant on getting a new GPU, then I personally would actually recommend something Radeon-based since they have better GPU-compute performance (unless you're talking about older architectures like the 5000 series vs fermi).

Let's put it this way - I don't think it's an accident that SVP's default profiles are 24fps rather than 23.976fps.

Well I always right-clicked, so...

If you need some anime video content with high visual quality, I typically use Nostromo's AMVs:
http://www.nostro.fr/amv/

Note that (currently) only his most recent AMV is 1080p while everything since Auriga is at least 720p.

But the topic creator uses a 144hz monitor, which is exactly 6x of 24fps...

(assuming the user is using 24fps content)

For such things I usually cheat and just use MKVtoolnix to set a 24fps or 30fps video to playback at 60fps.

When I want a really high quality video I usually use one of the many demo videos linked in this thread:
http://www.avsforum.com/forum/40-oled-t … tores.html

Uhh, all 1080p Blu-ray discs are only 30fps or lower, which kind of defeats the purpose of what I was hypothesizing...