Search options (Page 6 of 7)
Olombo wrote:Still no improvement in mpv/mpc.
In a certain scenario on laptops, they might be run by default by the wrong GPU.
You can make sure they are correctly run by your 4090 by going to Windows -> Graphics Settings and selecting the correct GPU:
https://gyazo.com/0b3743c4a935c491ea4b4ffaae2f8580
For best RIFE performance according to @aloola's data, try to play around with Nvidia TensorRT and the 4.6 version:
https://gyazo.com/2a635348c44e379ccaca0520c0f3c6a2
First time i'm hearing that a 4090 is bottlenecked by an old CPU. xD
reconhell wrote:Btw. if I turn off RTX video HDR in MPC-videorenderer settings, it will stop working
Glad u fixed it. Don't know, please show an image of this setting.
The Nvidia Filters basically apply the selected shaders on top of your image. So if u would have an HDR video and u would accidentally leave RTX HDR ON at the same time, you will see a badly colored video. Disable RTX HDR when playing HDR source videos.
reconhell wrote:Problem is the app is not recognised by the beta app for filter. after following instructions.
Yes, the beta app is glitchy. Try restarting PC with only the HDR monitor connected.
Also make sure you have mpc hc at Manage 3D -> Programs settings added.
https://gyazo.com/40cc150b9b1775d1f506c8af0fddfa93
If still fails follow all steps from description tab from here https://www.nexusmods.com/site/mods/781
If still fails download TrueHDRTweaks from same link, put it in the mpc hc folder and forcefully set the settings that u want, without ever actually using the nvidia overlay.
reconhell wrote:I use automatic so...
Why you think the ahsoka artefacts cant be fixed?
Can't reproduce the subtitles drastic movement on automatic on my system. Really curious if anyone else sees the same effect.
On that Ahsoka scene, a ship surrounded by clouds, flying through clouds with fast speed makes AI hard to predict the actual motion, i guess. I might be wrong here.
Record the anomaly and maybe people can reproduce if you provide them the same video you're watching.
Also an image of SVP configuration when u catch it. (something like this https://gyazo.com/1e6a09506e0c3ac249c4831a622654e7 )
From what i see, on older RIFE versions like 4.6 if your video has the subtitle burned in (you can't disable the subtitle) then it will try to apply the motion of the stuff behind it and accidentally wiggle the text.
This text wiggle disappears if the subtitle is on top of the interpolated video, or if you're using newer RIFE versions.
The Ahsoka artifacts don't think they can be fixed, but latest RIFE versions help a bit. xD
framo wrote:im using ncnn/vulkan and theres no drop down menu for me, am i doing sthg wrong?
i downloaded the v4.14 model
For non Nvidia users, they can't use the Nvidia Tensor RT RIFE .onnx model files from here:
https://github.com/AmusementClub/vs-mlrt/releases
But i think they can play around with other ncnn/vulkan versions by downloading them from here:
https://github.com/TNTwise/rife-ncnn-vu … g/20240218
and replacing these two files:
"C:\Program Files (x86)\SVP 4\rife\rife-v4\flownet.bin"
"C:\Program Files (x86)\SVP 4\rife\rife-v4\flownet.param"
yongbin wrote:but I do not have the Engine option.
Probably you have to install it separately by right clicking the SVP icon in taskbar and going to "Utilities" -> "Additional programs and features..."
https://gyazo.com/e2d77e20209ce646d4008edca0ef854a
Then click next, click the checkbox of "RIFE Interpolation engine" then click next again.
https://gyazo.com/6eb9f3ce78489d34e70639b47747b252
Once it gets downloaded you should be able to select that option.
Overall it should interpolate much better than "Automatic" mode, but it's more performance hungry.
dawkinscm wrote:For SVP I use Rife. I also use interpolation with some motion blur.
What i imagine when people enable interpolation from mpv config on top of the movie already being fully interpolated by RIFE:
https://gyazo.com/8ce62ce348609112c567448cb406a223
dawkinscm wrote:I pretty much have a fixed mpv/SVP configuration for VR.
Please share your mpv.conf solution, other VR users might be interested.
oriento wrote:When i tried rife 4.14 v2 (i just copied the onnx file)
To use the v2 versions you must not put them inside the v1 folder.
It should look something like this file structure:
The parent folder "C:\Program Files (x86)\SVP 4\rife\models\":
https://gyazo.com/5a4401fd17ff3d1f009120a5db754c2b
The v2 only folder:
"C:\Program Files (x86)\SVP 4\rife\models\rife_v2\"
https://gyazo.com/d7ec471252d535602bc4ece31bfaee27
The v1 only folder:
"C:\Program Files (x86)\SVP 4\rife\models\rife\"
https://gyazo.com/f2a125fec5f6a18e7e3eef28e1f85999
If done correctly, restart SVP and then you should be able to see selectable AI models with (v2) in their name like this:
https://gyazo.com/9d6d1360852e8e92f834425e69803cb0
dawkinscm wrote:but it still has issues with horizontal slow pans.
If i'm using the mpv setting "video-sync=display-resample" this scene has massive stutters:
https://youtu.be/jZvFEtR8RH0?si=59TEOOJ … m&t=18
We should either use "video-sync=audio" like Blackfyre's configs or nothing at all.
Kadet89 wrote:I'm going to buy a laptop with RTX40XX and plan to use it for RIFE.
What graphics would it take for these to work on the fly?
Testing on a RTX4080 mobile, trying only the fastest RIFE version which is 4.6 (v2) i'm getting following results for SVP with MPV without visible frame drops:
> 1080/24 -> 144 fps OK
> 1080/24 -> 240 fps OK if we resize to 0.75% of 1080p resolution by using resize -14400810
https://gyazo.com/dec005728711e6dd84f814390f505506
> 4k/24 -> 48 fps OK
> 4k/24 -> 60 fps OK if we resize to 0.75% of 4k resolution by using resize -28801620
https://gyazo.com/4e45b4401ca114cdad6f57921566223b
All other RIFE versions older/newer than 4.6 (v2) have higher GPU requirements.
Noticed no performance difference between a Dolby Vision HDR file and an average non HDR file.
Really curious if anyone around here can test the limits of a 4090. 
Now that Nvidia launched the Nvidia App on latest update that turns SDR games into HDR:
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/software/nvidia-app/
did people started playing around with the RTX HDR & RTX Dynamic Vibrance to watch their non-HDR videos with it ?
You can easily enable it on your video player by drag and dropping it in the NvTrueHDR app:
https://www.nexusmods.com/site/mods/781
issusi wrote:Change the last setting, "Duplicate frames removal" to "Do not remove" and try playing it.
I had a similar experience.
You're right! It significantly impacts the performance. I wonder why this option is even available, as it could easily confuse newcomers who might accidentally activate it.
fabian5003 wrote:I don't know what to do here.
Fabian try to play around with the resize setting until it works for your system:
https://gyazo.com/d2a3529fe06e8d5de601c7e64f99ca4e
https://www.svp-team.com/wiki/Manual:All_settings
And please tell us at what value it plays smoothly for u
framo wrote:Im trying to achieve 1080p 60 fps. But im getting like 1-3 fps with this settings.
From gerappa's answer from here https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopi … 954#p83954
it seems that all AMD users should rollback their drivers to AMD driver (v23.11.1) so they can still use 2 GPU threads for ncnn/vulkan, until AMD fix their drivers.
From what i checked on my 4080 RTX, ncnn/vulkan starts to become watchable at 60 fps on a resize value of -14400810 with 2 GPU threads, with more stable fps in mpv than MPC-HC.
https://gyazo.com/3adb99245de086ace7893a941fb36cb4
which means ncnn/vulkan is overall massively underperforming compared to the NVIDIA TensorRT neural engine.
I suggest to get used to downscaling it a bit. You can always return to the non-RIFE SVP interpolation if looks bad.
If any AMD users found other workarounds, please tell us.
framo wrote:And what are your profile settings (without rife ai) for fluid 60fps with minimal artifacts? (i dont watch anime)
Movies settings:
https://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=5624
Anime settings:
https://kokomins.wordpress.com/2019/10/ … -playback/
Blackfyre wrote:It's banding and crushed blacks that are the issue.
Maybe Chainik is right.
Blackfyre can u please try to see if u can reproduce that exact scenario with:
RIFE disabled (normal interpolation) + SVP + MPV ? example: https://gyazo.com/8cedda0a3fe610f50810178b9e54da7b
How about
SVP (interpolation disabled) + MPV ? example: https://gyazo.com/21658ebad006e2bcf284a73e168be62e
How about
SVP fully closed + direct MPV launch ? example: https://gyazo.com/049c2643d14b0087b9c6354f7da73815
Would be nice to know that it's MPV fault cause of random decoders configurations and leave it at that xD
RickyAstle98 wrote:Also I dont see need for RIFE+SVP content, because Lossless Scaling program updated to DXGI frame generation that only doubles framerate, VRR breaks, but its working, I do SVP to 82FPS and then enable LSFG and now I have 164FPS
RickyAstle98 I just tried the Lossless Scaling LSFG frame generation combined with MPV capped at 120 fps and i'm seeing major pixels wiggling issues.
It's like it tries to ununiformly speed up patches of screen, giving you an uneven movement like waves.
It looks like an abomination on this test scene: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/ … drive_link
My suggestion would be to use the SVP resize parameter to resize video to a lower resolution until you hit the spot where your system can handle RIFE at "164 fps without dropping frames, issues, flickering, bla bla bla bla bla..."
That way SVP will fully control the scene movement at all times.
If you use Lossless Scaling app for the upscaling, i compared performance between using Lossless Scaling app with Nvidia Image Scaling ON and MPV with Nvidia Image Scaling shader and using the app was much slower.
You can add yourself the Nvidia Image Scaling shader by following the instructions here and compare the performance differences: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/ … sp=sharing
Blackfyre wrote:Pictures look exaggerated
Nice issue, can you please link us where we can find this specific scene so we can test it too?
If an issue is too hard to diagnose and you run out of ideas, try fresh SVP reinstall and check if it still persists.
https://gyazo.com/3d9f8b056dd122aacc4584890220b7cc
Xenocyde wrote:Alrighty, guess I'll stick to MPV, but I'll need to figure out downscaling cuz no current GPU can manage 4K@120 from what I read.
Did you try the frc.frame.resize SVP application setting?
Questions for the guys that have more experience with upscaling:
Does increasing frc.frame.resize to 4K count as upscaling?
Does using madVR 4K upscaling filter as Gippy mentioned have a similar effect as Lossless Scaling's "Anime4K" filter?
Does using using madVR 4K / Anime4K filter on max settings give a less blurry image compared to Nvidia Image Scaling filter?
Which of them on max settings require less resources?
Which of them you would preffer and why?
I've played recently with the Lossless Scaling Steam application that can upscale everything and enjoyed a lot this Nvidia Image Scaling sharpness 10 filter:
https://gyazo.com/10533c577f69f9e7a2072856e8b5a54e
From my comparison i can't see differences between original image and Anime4K, but the Nvidia Image Scaling gives a much clear image:
Original: https://gyazo.com/f9aa57138e57d7fdb131b1f6581fdaea
Anime4K: https://gyazo.com/b4d4c18a104b3c6793996be377215e6c
Nvidia Image Scaling: https://gyazo.com/f7af1a0e05c8307d8966ec2c2082a97d
You can compare yourself by getting the Lossless Scaling app from Steam or piratebay or unzip it from here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/ … drive_link
Thanks!
From my experience your eyes cannot see any difference between a 60 and a 60.02 video.
It takes a bit more processing power if you tell it to interpolate to your fixed frame rate monitor refresh rate of 60.02 compared to allowing it to do the rounding to 60.
I think this is caused by SVP doing less work when you just ask it to double/triple the video's frame rate.
For max smoothness just select the maximum option which is 240 fps, cause it ends up smoother even if your monitor cannot display it properly cause of the limitations.
Blackfyre wrote:RickyAstle98 wrote:TechnoStone wrote:V2 models for some reason have jiggling, the more to the right and down, the worse the effect. Almost unnoticeable for 1080p, but very annoying for 1440p and 4K (both native and downscaled to 1440p, here's the example - https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/ … WGll8w.mp4). For this one, I'm running Game of Thrones S1 E1 at 4K on 3440x1440 (so SVP downscales to 2560x1440) at x2 framerate on 2080 Ti with 4.4v2, 4.6v2, 4.9v2 and 4.13_litev2. There's no such effect on V1 models (tried all same versions)
I dont have this problem, maybe you use target frame rate instead of interpolation factors? Because I do slomo video and see what happens on 25FPS video converted to 2.5x (no issues) (62.5FPS)
Then I do frame rate target at 60FPS and see your issue all the time, even without slomo effect! Dont use target framerate, factors work better!
Also this, make sure it's either 2x, 3x, 4x etc
Then open the drop down menu to the right of the slider, and enable at the bottom (Force Exact Value).
cws wrote:It's true there's no significant performance improvement, but there may be fixes and other minor improvements.
Specifically, when using v13 (with TensorRT 8.5 / CUDA 11.8) with the v2 models, I can see some blurriness and pixels shifting in the bottom right corner if there is some obvious static content there like a logo. If this is something you can reproduce, try using the latest v14 (with TensorRT 9.x / CUDA 12.x)
I checked by making a backups of both old SVP TensorRT and latest TensorRT v14 and switching them back and forth by looking at the mentioned trees scene.
I noticed that issue was present on all RIFE (v2) i tested even latest RIFE 14.4 (v2) on old SVP TensorRT.
Issue persisted when trying fixed FPS with Force Exact value on/off or FPS x2, which means it's unrelated.
I could not reproduce it anymore when replacing the old SVP TensorRT with latest TensorRT, which means it got FIXED on a version between old and latest.
Current default SVP installation has 4.6/4.9 v1 models which means average user never saw this jiggling issue.
In the future when SVP devs will want to add the v2 models they will surely update the default old TensorRT libraries too so your average user will never see this issue.
Until then we should follow @cws guide on how to update our own TensorRT library from https://github.com/AmusementClub/vs-mlrt/releases if we want to play around with latest RIFE models:
cws wrote:Right, TensorRT 9.x is in "beta" and not officially released. Still, v13 was released when TensorRT 8.5 was the latest version, when there is a new release of TensorRT 8.x (which is 8.6.)
There may be fixes and enhancements in the latest v14 releases which is not in v13. If you're willing to help test, I would try downloading https://github.com/AmusementClub/vs-mlr … 4.test3.7z and unzipping
and the folder
into
C:\Program Files (x86)\SVP 4\rife
emme wrote:Does anyone know of a video to simply force optimization at different odd resolutions?
https://gyazo.com/72f128647f6e8efef6fe87181f04cc7c
Hmm, don't know what could cause it then.
You already have all these installed and still crashes right?
https://gyazo.com/5defd01e5568a340b364ea340026b271
Also you've already tried clicking this button right?
https://gyazo.com/dae1ef8eb66abf91c46685c13932769e
it should add the mpv64 folder in system PATH variables and add the PYTHONPATH:
https://gyazo.com/67584d6eb4a71b5fed466e1896020f3d
Also you have this red file present in this folder?
https://gyazo.com/9e5e100306455ee46c1fa4edb2d43593
If issue persists we should let the SVP devs take a look.
I'm running into the same popup error if i delete this vapoursynth file:
https://gyazo.com/9e5e100306455ee46c1fa4edb2d43593
i would suggest to try a clean reinstall of SVP since only using the "Add or remove components" Setup Wizard did not fully fix the issue for me.
Follow their recommended setup afterwards:
https://www.svp-team.com/wiki/RIFE_AI_interpolation
dawkinscm wrote:It's a change to the code in base.py. I got this from a previous post by @blackmickey1007 for completely disabling SC.
SVP4\script\base.py
input_m = input_m.misc.SCDetect(threshold= 0.1 or 0.2).
The old line is:
input_m = input_m.misc.SCDetect(threshold=rife_sc)
and changing it manually to 0.1 and 0.2 values translates to:
- selecting "Scene change threshold" from SVP and selecting "10%" or "20%"
- or by going to application settings and search "rife_sc" and set it to 10 or 20 like in following image:
https://gyazo.com/714dd3a8a3159f1ac7f496126d92ee70
dawkinscm i suggest you revert that line change since SVP devs were nice enough to allow us to control it from both mentioned places.
For "completely disabling SC" just set "rife_sc" application setting at 100 to see max smoothness with zero animation stuttering.
Posts found: 126 to 150 of 161