Search options (Page 7 of 16)

Thanks for the link. In general I tend to downscale to FHD rather than upscale because there is zero advantage to upscaling my own sources. But this could be useful for poor quality acquired stuff so I will give it a go. Also I don't use a PC for 4K HDR.

That makes sense. Especially since mpv works much better than MPC+MadVR for SVP+Rife. Today I tried MPC+MadVR with a simpler config and it still couldn't handle my full resolution rips using Rife. However saying all that I'm also happy running my files reduced to FHD since it uses around 40% less GPU with Rife v4.15v2.

It's not stable. When you you are at my numbers with TRT 9.2, are you running large files that have 2x the vertical resolution of a FHD file at 72fps on v4.15?

Now that I'm back on TRT8.5.1 I am able to run Rife v4.15v2 at 72fps which uses about 75-90% GPU. The lite version uses about 60-80% GPU. For me I suppose that it goes without saying that:

4.15v2/72 > 4.15v2 lite/72 > 4.15v2/60 > 4.15v2/60 lite > everything else.

I don't see anything even after slowing it down. What am I supposed to see?

There's very little benefit in changing it. I've played with many of the options including this one and the default settings are mostly the best settings.

For me they are all about as smooth as each other but 4.15 and 4.15 lite have by far the least artefacts. 4.15 lite is the best all round.

You are welcome. You are almost there but not quite because if it says "ignore hfr sources" then you are still not running Rife. However if you follow the instructions on this page https://www.svp-team.com/wiki/Manual:SVPcode you should get there. Good luck

Using Lanczos resize makes a noticeable difference to GPU usage and performance plus I'm not seeing any scaling issues. So I'm guessing that the resize happens before the interpolation.

Sorry I didn't see this earlier. No I'm talking about the intro to the movie Hugo which is a little difficult for Rife unless you get the SCT right or turn it off completely. But after more testing I find I can use SCT at 12 for just about everything now.

It's interesting to see how many of the changes I have recently made have now been reverted since yesterday because of how well Rife v4.15 lite works. I'm back to using the default SVP install and TRT and back to using SCT set to 12. The only remaining change is vmslrt. With v4.15 lite/72fps the remaining stubbon artefacts I come across have definitely improved over any other version while still using only 60-70% GPU.

So this is a little weird. Before I got v4.15 Lite to be "almost" as good as v4.15/60fps by running the lite version at 72fps. But now, for the Alita battle drome scenes the Lite/72fps version actually handles artefacts a little better than base 4.15/60fps. I've made chages to my Nvidia Low latency settings which might make a processing speed difference. But I think maybe v4.15 has regressed a little with TRT 8.5 because I don't remember seeing these artefacts before but I have no actual evidence for this. I'm not prepared to do any new TRT testing until maybe 10.0.0.1 because even running at 72fps, the Lite version uses between 30 and 40% less GPU.

OK so I'm using the latest vsmlrt script because it supposedly properly detects the TRT version. When I did that I notice that I loose some performance with the 9.2 test versions. So I reset everything back to default including the default SVP TRT version (8.5.1) and got the performance back. So where I am now is similar to where I was before. Rife 4.15v2 lite should be the new SVP default version because it uses similar GPU to v4.9 but has better artefact handling. But Rife v4.15v2 is still the best version overall because it removes or reduces every artefact I've ever come across.