Search options (Page 8 of 24)

I don't know about you, but for me, DVDs don't play well with SVP at all. Not just the menus, but the actual videos keep skipping frames.

No point in supporting DVD menus until DVD videos are supported

Yep. I see better results when changing the order of operations. When doing frame-quadrupling, best results are when running SVP in-between the two doubles. BUT, as it was mentioned earlier, you'd then have the problem of SVP working with RGB data instead of YUV which would be much more demanding on ressources.

No, it doesn't work for DVDs, whether directly from the DVD or by ripping the DVD onto the computer. The DVD has to be converted/re-encoded in order for SVP to work with it. Otherwise, it lags and plays jerky.

I asked the devs a while ago and they just said "who watches DVDs nowadays anyway"

Just re-install AviSynth, period.

http://www.svp-team.com/files/3rd_party … th_258.exe

It's not the "default program" association that is broken. But if any video player sees a .avs file, how are they supposed to know how to interpret it? Something needs to be configured in the system for them to know that they must look for AviSynth.dll and try to run the .avs file through AviSynth. That part is what's not being ported in the Windows 10 upgrade.

I haven't tried it on Windows 10 yet. It seems something needs to be updated with the .NET Framework dependency.

As for the encoding error, it seems AVS isn't being recognized as a video file extension. I suppose you haven't installed AviSynth (or SVP) after upgrading? Is SVP working, because to play videos with SVP, the system must be able to recognize and play AVS files.

Chainik, plugging directly into the core libs to dynamically adjust settings is very smart. It will make the auto-crop feature much better.

Does that mean that for a same video, you can render certain scenes with higher settings and other scenes with more conservative settings to reduce artifacts, giving the best of both worlds?

You mentioned the somewhat stable version of AviSynth+ MT wasn't released yet. Development seems to be dead lately. Do you have any news on AviSynth+?

Great way of improving quality then! Lowering settings

Just thinking. Can you detect how much artifacts and halos you're generating? If that's the case, then perhaps you could also auto-lower or adjust settings to decrease artifacts in those cases.

If settings would auto-adjust themselves in the background, and there wouldn't be any lag, it would make it much easier for the user. Perhaps the only setting that would be necessary is whether we want to run the CPU up to 80%, 90% or 100%.

That's assuming you use an AviSynth that doesn't crash when being reset.

Chainik, how do you explain these differences in image quality?

Would it be possible for SVP to auto-select the best settings in real-time? You can detect if the CPU is under-utilized or if there are dropped frames, and you could tweak the settings automatically without the user seeing anything. But such a feature would be hazardous in an early beta.