1 Reply by bradwiggo

(3 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Chainik wrote:

1. "Is SVP code the same quality as the real time system?" - yes

2. "Will SVP provide better results than the method I linked?" - SVP provides a lot of options affecting smoothness in various ways.

3.  Neither hardware encoder will work on your AMD A10-7300. Your only option is software encoding.

Does the AMD one not work  as seen as I have an AMD graphics card. I was able to turn on AMD Fluid Motion Video using this: http://bluesky23.yukishigure.com/en/BlueskyFRC.html

Is the hardware encoding better than software encoding?

Go to forum: Using SVP

2 Topic by bradwiggo

(3 replies, posted in Using SVP)

I am thinking of buying SVP 4 Pro, however I have a few questions:

1. My computer is not very powerful, and it lags when using the free trial on a video. The specs of my computer are: AMD A10-7300 and Radeon R6 integrated graphics, 8GB RAM. If I use SVP Code, will it allow me to perform the same motion interpolation as a high end computer would, but just not in real time. Is SVP code the same quality as the real time system?

2. I have tried another interpolation method (http://www.spirton.com/convert-videos-to-60fps/, this one, the one linked on the SVP wiki), however, this method did not work as well as I would have liked. It did improve the movement of the camera, which looked a lot smoother, however, the character moving on screen did not look like they were running at 60fps, they were improved, but not that much. I have seen examples on youtube which are better. Will SVP provide better results than the method I linked?

3. I noticed on the SVP code wiki page that there was a list of encoders (Intel QuickSync, NVIDIA NVENC, AMD AMF,). Does the decoder you can use depened on your graphics card? Also are some encoders better than others? For example as seen as I am on AMD can I not use the intel or NVidia ones?

Go to forum: Using SVP