1 Reply by puwaha

(26 replies, posted in Using SVP)

That is good to hear, I just want to avoid as much artifacting as possible as it can distract from the interpolation effect.  So I don't want to go too low with system specifications that it is just on the edge of performing well all the time.  I guess I'm looking for enough power, but also with headroom.

So, a Core i5 or Phenom X6 processor with a Radeon 6670 or an Nvidia 450?  This would be sufficient for SVP and MadVR at the same time?

Go to forum: Using SVP

2 Reply by puwaha

(26 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Thank you, seems I didn't scroll the window to the right to see the real-world FPS section.  So it seems that you need a Core i7 2600K with a Nvidia 480 or better to do 60 FPS on the "highest" settings.  That's a pretty powerful machine.

Is there much visual difference between "High" and "highest"?

I'm looking to build a new computer, and I was looking to see what it would take to use SVP to it's fullest.  I currently have a Core 2 Duo E7300 with the stock IGP, and the decent results at 480p and 720p make me want to explore this further.  I'm looking to build the perfect computer that can do SVP at 1080p and MadVR.

Anyone here using SVP and MadVR together at the highest settings?  If so, what type of system do you have?

Go to forum: Using SVP

3 Reply by puwaha

(26 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Also I am looking at the SVPMark results spreadsheet... what is the real-life full HD score that is a minimum for high-quality playback?  I'm trying to figure out how these charts translate to real-world performance.

Go to forum: Using SVP

4 Reply by puwaha

(26 replies, posted in Using SVP)

The chart that is here:  http://www.svp-team.com/wiki/GPU_Compatibility

It is showing a GTS 250 as being much faster than any other card for SVP.  Is there a reason for this?  Is this score also taking into account the CPU?

Go to forum: Using SVP