1 Reply by daglax

(5 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Thanks for the answer. Did you compare both on the same movie especially one with fast action scenes? Then i get a huge amount of artifacts with SVP on very high settings and on my friends TV the interpolation still is very fluent.
I can't imagine that this behavior depends only on the pure hardware solution on the TV whereas a PC has to use Software calculation. In the end, it's all about calculating the algorithms...
The frame interpolation of PowerDVD or SplashPro for example works quite well without artifacts and huge amounts of CPU-power.

Go to forum: Using SVP

2 Topic by daglax

(5 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Hi,

i am using SVP for a couple of days now and i am wondering how it compares to the frame interpolation settings most modern TVs do have built in.
As far is i know, the FI on TVs is a bit better because of the much smaller amount of artifacts in the picture. SVP produces - even on the highest settings - much more artifacts depending on the movie source.
So why are TVs that good even with their ridiculous weak CPU? Or am i wrong and SVP has a better FI than good TVs?

Go to forum: Using SVP

3 Topic by daglax

(1 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Hi all!

i found the "Frame Crop"-option in the SVP manager to be very useful. The problem is, i built a screen with a ratio of 2.46:1 (don't ask me why  smile ), so the default profiles (2.40:1, 1.85:1, 16:9, 4:3) don't work for me. Is there any chance i can modify any default profile, for example the 2.40:1 profile, to match my 2.46:1 screen aspect ratio?
I don't want to adjust the frame crop manually by the "Custom..."-option, because that depends on the movie i am watching (a 4:3 movie has other crop parameters than a 16:9 movie).

Thanks for your help!

Go to forum: Using SVP