UHD wrote:

The performance of the Tensor Cores of the new NVIDIA graphics cards is amazing! I'd be happy to help test as soon as I can buy one of these:

It is said that the performance of Optical Flow is also improved by about 2.5 times, because DLSS 3 uses motion interpolation.


https://images.nvidia.com/aem-dam/Solutions/geforce/ada/news/dlss3-ai-powered-neural-graphics-innovations/nvidia-dlss-3-motion-optical-flow-accelerator.jpg

2

(9 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Nintendo Maniac 64
That's good point  cool

3

(9 replies, posted in Using SVP)

It is not specific codec or resolution matters directly because it is not SVP that handles decoding.

What only and always matters is that your PC performance can handles both workload from the decoding and SVP process.
Using better codec or HW to get better decode performance is one of obvious asset to improve your chance to success. (Using up-to-date SVP or adjust SVP option also can make difference)
Like the 0.png I attached. (its FHD HEVC demo video)


LAV filters is now v0.64.4 and got several improvements over 0.58.1. It wouldn't be hurt to try is  neutral
https://code.google.com/p/lavfilters/

And the video engine of  GTX 550 TI slightly outdated, so you may consider upgrade to 960 which has most advanced NVIDIA video engine today and "full hardware-decode of HEVC Version 1 (Main and Main 10 profiles) to the GPU's video-engine" (according to the wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_Pu … reVideo_HD ).


P.S : MPC-HC 1.7.8 is here
http://mpc-hc.org/

It is obvious that performance graphs UI is not scalable by the screenshot. (attached 1.png)

And SVP Index history graph is a little hard to catch actual performance information as it shows too large range.

By my personal experience, for optimal SVP UX, SVP Index should be maintained 0.97x or higher and even very small drop below 0.97x (e.g. 0.93x or 0.89x) can have recognizable negative effect (compared against the optimal result of course, not compared against the original without using SVP).

Thus, I think that adding some user-customizable option to adjust SVP Index graph to show most important area (e.g. 0.90~1.00) only, to make it easier to catch fine details, can be valuable improvement.

5

(10 replies, posted in Using SVP)

Nintendo Maniac 64 wrote:

But by that logic it shouldn't be limited to specifically that but instead be user-customizable - in particular, some people hate high framerates and interpolation for movie content but are perfectly fine with it for video game footage and content.

I think that can be arranged with current system. Movies are always 24FPS (unless get back to the a silent film era, or HFR films those have high framerates by native) and others comes with 30+ FPS usually. So you just need to set two profiles for each resolution. 24 FPS and 30 FPS.

But make it user-customizable is good idea. Maybe some people would find benefit from switching 3 sets of profiles   cool

6

(10 replies, posted in Using SVP)

I think that manual switching between 2 sets of profiles by Shortcut Key would be practical and likely the best solution.

e.g. Ctrl + Alt + A for Anime profiles
Ctrl + Alt + T for Tv/movies