I will test evr-cp
Edit 1
There is no difference with EVR-CP. Same performance as Mad-Vr. Reducing the Motion vector grid to 12px is the only way to get a smooth playback with GPU-acceleration. So if I want to use a motion vector grid of 6px for SD-videos I have to use no GPU-acceleration. It is strange because the peformance index with or without GPU-acceleration is the same and is during playback at 0.97-1.03.
Edit 2
I had some time for further testing.
MadVr uses 20-25% (SD-HD-Full HD) GPU Power.
EVR-CP uses 20-25% (SD-HD-Full HD) GPU Power.
EVR uses 9-10% (SD-HD-Full HD) GPU Power.
MadVr+SVP (GPU-accelaration) :
SD-Videos
(SVPShader Standard |Motion Vector Grid 12px| Motion vector precision: Half Pixel) 60% GPU Power (very smooth plaback) CPU-25-30%
(SVPShader Standard |Motion Vector Grid 6px| Motion vector precision: Half Pixel ) 60% GPU Power (not so smooth as at 12Px, sometimes slight stuttering) CPU ca. 40-60%
HD-Videos
(SVPShader Standard |Motion Vector Grid 12px| Motion vector precision: One Pixel ) 75% GPU Power (smooth plaback but some slight stuttering) CPU ca 50%
Full HD
(SVPShader Simple |Motion Vector Grid 16px| Motion vector precision: Two Pixel ) 75% GPU Power (clear visible stuttering ) CPU 60-70%
EVR-CP
The same values as MadVr but playback seems a bit better on HD Videos.
EVR:
10-15 % less GPU power on all formats no slight stuttering on HD-Videos, only slight stuttering at Full HD videos overall best performance on all Videos
Because of this results i will change from MadVr to EVR. EVR-CP has no advantage for me.
The thing I don't understand is that the GPU in no case was near 100%. So why is there such a huge difference between EVR and MadVr/EVR-CP when using GPU-acceleration in SVP?