Topic: MadVR integration?

Just tried the new SVP 4 version, works great!


Correct me if I'm wrong, but I noticed SVP still interpolates frames before feeding them to MadVR... which is usually better than getting SVP to interpolate upscaled frames, I suppose. However, I remember seeing madshi on the forums awhile back, and was wondering if there are any plans to further integrate SVP and MadVR somehow? I don't expect ya'll to feed motion vector data to MadVR, but some computers (like my Xeon/Quadro 600 workstation, or laptops with weak IGPs) could benefit from an option that lets SVP interpolate MadVR's upscaled frames, shifting more of the load to the CPU and freeing up resources for MadVR's extra effects.

Re: MadVR integration?

brucethemoose wrote:

Just tried the new SVP 4 version, works great!


Correct me if I'm wrong, but I noticed SVP still interpolates frames before feeding them to MadVR... which is usually better than getting SVP to interpolate upscaled frames, I suppose. However, I remember seeing madshi on the forums awhile back, and was wondering if there are any plans to further integrate SVP and MadVR somehow? I don't expect ya'll to feed motion vector data to MadVR, but some computers (like my Xeon/Quadro 600 workstation, or laptops with weak IGPs) could benefit from an option that lets SVP interpolate MadVR's upscaled frames, shifting more of the load to the CPU and freeing up resources for MadVR's extra effects.

They're in contact so I'm sure they're aware of the pros and cons. It would be nice to hear the official status no this issue though.

Calling @Chainik ! (That doesn't actually do anything....)

Re: MadVR integration?

http://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=2590
http://www.svp-team.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=2757

Re: MadVR integration?

It would be nice to hear the official status no this issue though

no status...
madshi agreed to take a look at Vapoursynth integration some day...