New RIFE filter - 3x faster AI interpolation possible in SVP!!! (Page 87 of 87)

This is probably a stupid question however, with AI software, I have noticed that on a 4090, RT is faster than CUDA but not by much.

A 4090 has 128 RT cores and >16000 coda cores.

Is it true that with SVP, when RT cores are being used, CUDA cores are not really being used, and vice versa?

In that case, half the power of the GPU is wasted.

Would it be possible to implement both TensorRT AND CUDA simultaneously to double the performance?

Guys, can anyone check if they made any significant improvements since last time by testing the 20x frame generation on 4k videos?
https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comment … n_30_with/

Can someone please post updated instructions on installing and using V2 rife models?
I tried to get it done based on this thread but all the significant information is either from 2023 with dead links, doesn't work or is impossible to understand for us common folk.
I attempted to add the "4.25 heavy" v2 model with and without replacing "vsmlrt.py". It appears in the "AI model" dropdown menu but no matter what I do I can't get it to work.

Rename the 4.25 heavy to 4.30 for example, worked for me without replacing vsmlrt.py a long time ago!

raider10 wrote:

RickyAstle98 wrote:

LSFG3 vs LSFG2 on any multipliers - smoother and better! Quality increased, same fast transitions now look more accurate, not just a fluid!

Im using RIFE x3 + LSFG x2 for 24>144 movies conversion, usually GPU usage looks like RIFE x4 with 6x real FLUIDITY rate!

On videos with LSFG3 only, looks pretty normal, conversion from 24FPS is less accurate, but smooth enough!

Do you do it with lossless scaling?

As you can see, I did RIFE x3 (1st action) on movie, then (LSFG3 x2) ontop!
I'm probably missing something obvious but how are you applying it? I only see a Steam implementation, nothing else.

The LSFG3 x3 alone: looks choppier and less accurate than RIFE x3 mode, takes 8 times less resources!

Thats better solution for 4K videos for example! For HFR monitor owners SPECIFICALLY! Usage: when your GPU able to do 3x RIFE with 4K input, theres enough GPU headroom to RIFE x2 + LSFG3 x3 ontop without 100% usage!

dawkinscm wrote:

RickyAstle98 wrote:

As you can see, I did RIFE x3 (1st action) on movie, then (LSFG3 x2) ontop!
I'm probably missing something obvious but how are you applying it? I only see a Steam implementation, nothing else.

The LSFG3 x3 alone: looks choppier and less accurate than RIFE x3 mode, takes 8 times less resources!

Thats better solution for 4K videos for example! For HFR monitor owners SPECIFICALLY!

Usage: when your GPU able to do 3x RIFE with 4K input, theres enough GPU headroom to RIFE x2 + LSFG3 x3 ontop without 100% usage!

For 144Hz users (1080p output / 4070 power levels): RIFE x3 + LSFG x2 = looks very smooth (24>144 / GPU usage 70% ~120W)

For 240Hz users (1080p output / 4070 power levels): RIFE x2.5 + LSFG3 x4 = looks very smooth and accurate (24>240 / GPU usage 80% ~130W)

For 360Hz users (1080p output / 4070 power levels): RIFE x3 + LSFG3 x5 = looks very smooth and accurate (24>360)

All tests done with 4.4v2 model (old) for GPU usage local measurement, newest models almost 2 times heavier, the multiplier decision, gentlemens, is up to you!

Part of my message got lost. I was asking how are you actually running LSFG? I have not seen anything except for a steam package.

I will upload quick video YT guide, I cant record generated frames from LSFG overlay!

https://youtu.be/8cIXy2IuMAs